[Tfug] Our website: Round three

[Ronald Sutherland]

johngalt1 wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "erich" <ericCH>
>
>   
>> until now.  We all agree that :
>>
>>                                        http://www.tfug.org/
>>
>> needs fixing. Maybe we should take it from the other direction. How
>>     
> Stirring the pot again?
> John
>   
Fixing is probably the wrong way to think about it. To put this in 
perspective if the iRack needs a bit less iProducts but may stand on its 
own if the iBoss with a strong will to dominate just left those who have 
to use the iRack solve there own iF'ing problems. TFUG is less about a 
web site and more about a list, in that sense the web site is doing OK. 
For myself I like to put lots of incoherent shit on the Internet, and 
serve it from my Linux boxes at home. I can view it form most places 
around the world but much of it is... well its shit, and would best be 
used as a source for e-methane. I would love the chance to shovel some 
of of this fine fertilizer to others but I'm not sure thats fair. Anyway 
my thoughts are that many in this group can setup there own servers and 
do as they please with them, having said that a Wiki may make it easy 
for several from the list to provide reviews of the watering holes in 
Tucson, or other fine things that may help a Lin/BSD/*nix (i*nix hehe) 
person visiting our town.