[Tfug] Gates-Rockefeller eugenics projects

[Malcolm Schmerl]

Very well said, John. Thanks for taking the time.

John Mc wrote:
> Sorry, I can't let this go. The comment I made last week about everything being "crystal clear" was a thinly veiled reference to the movie, A FEW GOOD MEN. That great American, Nathan R. Jessup, I wrote about is the Jack Nicholson character, the colonel in charge of pre 9-11, Gitmo. It was all meant as a joke because I had the time to accurately look up (and thus reference them in my own mind for accuracy) the comments I made.
>
> Dude, sorry to have to tell you this, but the Jim March comment below is dead-on accurate. Not all things you read on that great information source of electrons is true. Some people just make things up trying to influence the thinking of others. That is why the web site, scopes.com was written. I watched that YouTube video you linked to a week ago. The one with the Linux mascot inter-spaced in the middle of the grainy video about the Illumenati. I laughed out loud at that. It was actually worth the time I spent for the effort. That video gave me the energy to write the satire comment about now being "crystal clear in the manner of the great American, Nathan Jessup." It appears that you weren't part of the comedy. People seem to just enjoy making things up and either putting those thoughts on a web page or into an email with which they can then hit the send button. There is a scientific difference between facts and opinions. Facts can be verified by our commonly shared knowledge base, more education and scholarly/academic research. Despite what a lot of opinion pundits inherently claim, everyone isn't entitled to their own facts. Opinions are available to everyone, usually unequally. It is extremely important in this life to understand the difference between facts and opinions. When somebody at a national level, a position of authority because of that soap box, asserts something in a statement, we all take those statements as automatically true until we find out otherwise. Our leadership isn't supposed to lie to us. That's fraud. It is supposed to work that when those statements are shown to be flat out, bold faced lies within hours of being made, and that those statements are easily verified and understood to be lies, we call that person a liar and he/she loses any remaining credibility they may still cling to. Having a conscience and being able to reason is part of what enables a nation of laws and not men. A conscience is required to exist in society without being thrown in jail. A person without a conscience is at best, marginally psychopathic. That is the difference between a Democracy and lesser forms of government. If enough people in society can't reason effectively then you won't have or be able to keep a Democracy.
>
> Dude, either get back on your meds or find a different life outside of posting this crap. What you have been advocating isn't factual, or even close. It doesn't even rise to the level of opinion since it is so lame. A reasonable person, upon viewing the Tux image in the grainy Illumenati video, understood what it was about. It was a great, short comedy piece but nothing more. Really. After that initial posting the subject lost its comic edge. If you can't think through and understand this then you need to drop off the list and spend your new found time improving yourself, educationally speaking. People who can't think rationally are holding back the future of mankind. National leaders without a conscience who repeatedly lie (and thus aren't rational) to their fellow citizens are at best, just plain evil. They establish a new low level of behavior that causes mankind to regress instead of progress.
>
> And if you have been doing all this as a running gag, a joke, then that is just as lame. Just think of the personal time you have wasted. Try to imagine what you could have been doing to improve your life. There is a life outside of sitcoms and trolling the internet for bites. Go find it.
>
>
>