[Tfug] Our website: Round three

[Ronald Sutherland]

Jim Secan wrote:
> Ronald Sutherland wrote:
>   
>> TFUG is less about a
>> web site and more about a list, in that sense the web site is doing OK.
>>     
> <snip>
>   
>> having said that a Wiki may make it easy
>> for several from the list to provide reviews of the watering holes in
>> Tucson, or other fine things that may help a Lin/BSD/*nix (i*nix hehe)
>> person visiting our town.
>>     
>
> I have the hillbilly approach to these things - if it ain't broke, don't
> fix it.  I don't think it's particularly "broke" because I also feel that
> the list is TFUG, not the site.  All the site should have is "hey, there's
> a FUG in town, here's when/where we meet, and there's a list and you sign
> up as follows."  I don't think a wiki will work unless someone wants to
> take on the self-flagillistic role of Keeper of the Damn Wiki to muck out
> the drek that sometimes overtakes the list (which, on the list, is flushed
> out by time and appropriate use of the Del key).  In the case of a TFUG
> site, less is best.
>
> <nuk>
>
> Jim
and at any rate we can always SPAM the list with our web sites, for 
example I like my method which is simple... embedded in my e-mail 
address is my web address, and thats a powerful trick, which I have yet 
to catch crap over (but now Expectk is looking for some iCrap).