bexley401 at yahoo.com
Sat Jan 31 04:13:02 MST 2009
> On 22 Jan 2009 at 14:12, Bexley Hall wrote:
> > Actually, I believe *all* of the WRT54G's are "Linux-powered"
> > (or, at the very least, easily reflashed with a Linux kernel)
> Actually the WRT54Gv5 is NOT flashable -- not enough flash
> storage (2mb instead of 4mb).
<frown> The smaller flash doesn't make it "un-flashable";
it just means you can only put smaller images *into* the
Note that much consumer kit is reflashable even though
it might not provide a utility to do so (like the "upgrade
firmware" screen in the stock 54G's). But, to do so, you
may need to resort to JTAG tools. This is a bit more involved
and usually requires special jigs and/or adding connections
to the "main sircuit board" -- since *building* the units with
the extra "connector" needlessly adds a few microcents to
the product's cost :-/
> After they "upgraded" the v4 to the v5,
> the dd-wrt people discovered
> they could no longer "upgrade" the native OS to
> their own distro. The 54GL was
> brought out in response to demand for the older versions
> with more RAM as sales
> dropped off significantly enough to get Linksys's
Ah! It would be amusing to have been a fly in a hole in
the wall when they had *that* "internal discussion"! :>
I'm sure there was pressure from the NIH'ers to move
away from a GPL'ed product just to "stick it to 'em".
And, another crowd probably pushing to cater even
*more* to these "consumers". It would be interesting to
see how big of a market share was impacted and guess
at the cost-benefit analysis they must have done...
> See "Linksys WRT54G series" at Wikipedia for more
> It has more than you ever need to know and it also lists
> all the different
> variants (WRT54G, WRT54GS, WRT54GL, and WRTSL54GS) along
> with flashability etc.
More information about the tfug