[Tfug] Is TFUG dead?

[Jon]

A very long time ago I suggested to everyone that we move away from the 
listserve to a forum and was nearly lynched for suggesting it.

I find it easier to search a forum than a list archive. Admittedly a 
listserve is less maintenance but I was looking for functionality. Meh. 
Whatever the group wants.

Speaking of being lynched.  Is Bowie still on the list?


On January 5, 2015 5:32:38 PM Keith Smith <techlists at phpcoderusa.com> wrote:

>
> Hey we could all set up a blog and when we want to say something or have
> a question, we can post it to our blog and then anyone wanting to engage
> that conversation can post comments to that particular blog.
>
>
> On 2015-01-05 15:55, Jon wrote:
> > I was poking fun. No harm no foul.
> >
> > --
> > Betty "last of the golden girls" White
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On January 4, 2015 10:52:39 PM malcolm <mjs355 at comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Betty, Erich is the one who has the problem. Talk to him. It has never
> >> bothered me.
> >>
> >> On 01/04/2015 10:13 PM, Jon wrote:
> >> > If an email being filtered as a result of a spam filter is considered
> >> > censoring then I'm Betty White.
> >> >
> >> > I will look into turning off the spam (censor) filter to keep that
> >> > from happening.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On January 4, 2015 9:34:27 PM malcolm <mjs355 at comcast.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Erich says he's being censored by spam filters.
> >> >>
> >> >> On 01/04/2015 09:00 PM, Jon wrote:
> >> >> > Who is being censored and by whom?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On January 4, 2015 7:06:25 PM malcolm <mjs355 at comcast.net> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> I may not post much but read it all. From my point of view, TFUG is
> >> >> >> still well and kicking. I don't have much fondness for any form of
> >> >> >> censorship.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On 01/03/2015 07:59 PM, erich wrote:
> >> >> >> > Thanks to,
> >> >> >> >        Rigorous restrictions on posting  set up by Spam filters
> >> >> >> > This, is the first post , as far as I can see for the new year.
> >> >> >> >       There used to be elaborate posts , (They weren't obnoxious,
> >> >> >> > but they were only mildly informative).
> >> >> >> >        It's frustrating to make a long-winded post only to have
> >> >> >> > it kicked back by the spam censors isn't it?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Erich
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> >> > Tucson Free Unix Group - tfug at tfug.org
> >> >> >> > Subscription Options:
> >> >> >> > http://www.tfug.org/mailman/listinfo/tfug_tfug.org
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> >> Tucson Free Unix Group - tfug at tfug.org
> >> >> >> Subscription Options:
> >> >> >> http://www.tfug.org/mailman/listinfo/tfug_tfug.org
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > Tucson Free Unix Group - tfug at tfug.org
> >> >> > Subscription Options:
> >> >> > http://www.tfug.org/mailman/listinfo/tfug_tfug.org
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Tucson Free Unix Group - tfug at tfug.org
> >> >> Subscription Options:
> >> >> http://www.tfug.org/mailman/listinfo/tfug_tfug.org
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Tucson Free Unix Group - tfug at tfug.org
> >> > Subscription Options:
> >> > http://www.tfug.org/mailman/listinfo/tfug_tfug.org
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Tucson Free Unix Group - tfug at tfug.org
> >> Subscription Options:
> >> http://www.tfug.org/mailman/listinfo/tfug_tfug.org
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tucson Free Unix Group - tfug at tfug.org
> > Subscription Options:
> > http://www.tfug.org/mailman/listinfo/tfug_tfug.org
>
> --
> Keith Smith
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tucson Free Unix Group - tfug at tfug.org
> Subscription Options:
> http://www.tfug.org/mailman/listinfo/tfug_tfug.org