[Tfug] Fwd: Open Government Initiative
Christopher Robbins
robbinsc at gmail.com
Wed May 9 17:42:27 MST 2012
Wait, how was that a government information service? In fact, the story
doesn't even say that it was attacked legally, just that a lawyer felt that
it was condoning racial profiling?
>From your link -
"A Valley attorney said a new website that allows users to identify anyone
they suspect is an illegal immigrant is a recipe for racial profiling.
Attorney
Daniel Ortega said the site, www.illegalalienreport.com, promotes hate
based on the color of skin.
*The site appeared to have been taken down by Wednesday afternoon.*"
It doesn't appear that the site was run by the government, or taken down by
government forces...
I'm with John - why not let it run its course instead of assuming ill
intent?
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Joshua Zeidner <jjzeidner at gmail.com> wrote:
> sorry wrong link : http://www.ktar.com/?nid=6&sid=1539055
>
> -jmz
>
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Joshua Zeidner <jjzeidner at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > A recent example of an information service being attacked legally:
> >
> > http://www.ktar.com/?nid=6&sid=1539115
> >
> > Unfortunately, they had to take the site down. I'm sure similar
> > services are also legally bullied.
> >
> > -jmz
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Joshua Zeidner <jjzeidner at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:02 PM, John Gruenenfelder
> >> <jetpackjohn at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On May 7, 2012 4:36 PM, "Joshua Zeidner" <jjzeidner at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Hi Keith,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm suspicious as well.
> >>>>
> >>>> Most of these programs aim to appeal to ideas such as 'transparency',
> >>>> 'information access', etc. but typically want to promote some kind of
> >>>> political bias. In the case of Tucson and Phoenix, demographics data
> is a
> >>>> CRITICAL NATIONAL ISSUE and I doubt very much that some local
> initiative
> >>>> would have the political clout to simply start publishing it on the
> net.
> >>>>
> >>>> -jmz
> >>>
> >>> While I have no desire to be used or lied to, doesn't it seem
> >>> counterproductive to assume ill will and malfeasance from the start?
> Let's
> >>> face it, this isn't something that has been tried repeatedly and ended
> in
> >>> failure. At least, not in Arizona and Tucson.
> >>
> >> The risk here is that ALL efforts to publish information will be
> >> under the aegis of said organizations (which as claimed are private
> >> non-profits). If any efforts don't coincide with their political
> >> goals, then they don't get implemented. These kind of things are
> >> constructed to appear to be positive and neutral.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> It would best to take the offer at face value until there is some sign
> that
> >>> the goal is something other than open government. I should think it
> would
> >>> be fairly obvious to detect being jerked around.
> >>>
> >>> I also don't understand your statement about the demographics data.
> >>> Regardless of whether or not the data is nationally important, why
> wouldn't
> >>> a local initiative be able to place it online?
> >>
> >> If a local sheriff cannot enforce State and Federal law without
> >> constant interference and harassment from the Federal government, do
> >> you really think that a local IT initiative is going to be able to
> >> operate without interference? of course not. Being that this group
> >> seems both legit and unconcerned about these risks speaks loud and
> >> clear.
> >>
> >> -jmz
> >>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tucson Free Unix Group - tfug at tfug.org
> Subscription Options:
> http://www.tfug.org/mailman/listinfo/tfug_tfug.org
>
--
Christopher P Robbins
P: 480.336.3043
C: 928.257.6368
Email: robbinsc at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tfug.org/pipermail/tfug_tfug.org/attachments/20120509/3401d455/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the tfug
mailing list