[Tfug] OT: Bailout Bill
Paul Scott
waterhorse at ultrasw.com
Thu Sep 25 10:36:10 MST 2008
Jim Secan wrote:
> At 09:56 AM 09/25/2008 -0700, keith smith wrote:
>
>> Are we not in a pickle? If we fund this bailout we all pay and the ones who
>> caused the problem get away with it. If no bailout what does that do to our
>> economy? Will it crash? Will the world economy crash?
>>
>> It seems we are in a pickle. You and I will more than likely pay $2000 each
>> for the bailout, or so that is the figure I am hearing.
>>
>> Do we have a choice? Do we want another Great Depression?
>>
>
> We don't really know, and given the propensity for shading the truth (I'm
> trying to be polite) by the current administration it's hard to tell.
>
I understand that part of this was caused during the Clinton
administration when the distinction between investment banks and
commercial was removed allowing all banks to invent in ridiculously
leveraged ways.
> Their approach is to propose a solution that is, from what I can tell,
> horrifically bad and then try to force it down our throats because the
> barbarians are at the gates. Basically, the Bush plan is "give us $700
> billion with no oversight and trust us to do the right thing".
Which is just a chance to make the leverage even worse. It's already
totally broken today.
> Yeah, right.
>
> The fact that they don't want to put limits on the payouts given to CEOs
> bailing out of these failed institutions gives us an idea of where they're
> heads are at (up and locked, pretty much).
Yes!
> The argument is that the
> companies in risk of going belly up won't take the US bailout money because
> of all the little niggling strings attached. That'll show them Democrats.
> I don't see this happening. If a company leadership turns down a bailout
> because they don't get their golden parachutes and the company then tanks,
> I would hope that their shareholders would take a dim enough view of this
> that heads might literally role.
>
See your next sentence.
> But, then again, the people in this country have shown a remarkable level
> of stupidity over the past several decades, so anything is possible.
Paul Scott
More information about the tfug
mailing list