[Tfug] Damned Intel WiFi (2200BG series mini-PCI) stopped working...
Jim March
1.jim.march at gmail.com
Tue Sep 18 21:15:09 MST 2007
Well this may explain it: note the "radio off" thing on Eth1 (the
Intel WiFi card)!?
---jim at jim-acer:~$ iwconfig
lo no wireless extensions.
eth0 no wireless extensions.
eth1 radio off ESSID:""
Mode:Managed Channel:0 Access Point: Not-Associated
Bit Rate:0 kb/s Tx-Power=off Sensitivity=8/0
Retry limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off
Power Management:off
Link Quality:0 Signal level:0 Noise level:0
Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0
Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed beacon:0
wifi0 no wireless extensions.
ath0 IEEE 802.11g ESSID:"jimnet" Nickname:""
Mode:Managed Frequency:2.417 GHz Access Point: 00:15:E9:D8:F7:B9
Bit Rate:54 Mb/s Tx-Power:15 dBm Sensitivity=0/3
Retry:off RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off
Power Management:off
Link Quality=57/94 Signal level=-39 dBm Noise level=-96 dBm
Rx invalid nwid:824 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0
Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed beacon:0
jim at jim-acer:~$
Jim again: note that pulling the Ath0 PCMCIA card doesn't help any.
On 9/18/07, Jim March <1.jim.march at gmail.com> wrote:
> SIGH.
>
> OK. Some may recall the saga to date. Extreme short form: the
> internal Atheros-based mini-pci WiFi card in my Acer laptop died of
> "coke overdose" at one of the TFUG meets. While selling an old
> Fujitsu carcass for it's screen I noticed it had an internal mini-pci
> Intel 2200BG series card - yanked that, dropped it in the Acer, worked
> GREAT.
>
> Until now.
>
> Ubuntu (7.04) seems to see it. It appears as an "Eth1" device same as
> always, Eth0 (hardwire Ethernet) is present and working and if I put
> my Atheros-based PCMCIA card in, it shows up as Ath0.
>
> When the Intel card worked, I could still insert the PCMCIA WiFi Ath0
> device and under the Network Manager pull-down menu in Gnome it would
> list all available SSIDs twice, grouped under the Atheros (PCMCIA) and
> Intel cards. It was kinda neat, because you could see at a glance how
> much more signal strength the Intel card had.
>
> Those "group names" (Intel 2200BG and Atheros) are still listed as
> usual, but with no SSIDs under the Intel card. It's as if somebody
> snipped the antenna cables, but since I'm hooking to a router one FOOT
> away I figure it oughta work with no antenna at all?
>
> I popped the access plate, re-seated the Intel card and checked the
> antenna connections. It all looks fine.
>
> Somebody mentioned a second set of drivers (open source vs. the binary
> blob I'm on now)? I'm thinking I should swap them out, see if that's
> it rather than the card mysteriously going "poof"?
>
> Any other advice? This is a damned nuisance...
>
> Jim
>
More information about the tfug
mailing list