[Tfug] Xsupplicant woes -- setup misery (now wpa_supplicant woes)

[Matt Jacob]

On 7/9/07, Claude Rubinson <rubinson at u.arizona.edu> wrote:
> Don't feel stupid.  I'm beginning to think that WPA--and, in
> particular, the associated "documentation" (if you want to call it
> that)--was all designed as a huge April Fools joke.  It's awful.

Yeah, except that WEP can be broken in a matter of minutes, and WPA
has yet to be cracked when using keys of sufficient length. WPA2 + AES
+ 63 characters [0-9a-zA-Z] = impenetrable fortress of security. ;-)

Matt