[Tfug] A very nice bandwidth test page...

[Ken Fancher]

7615/550 cox regular service

-----Original Message-----
From: tfug-bounces at tfug.org [mailto:tfug-bounces at tfug.org] On Behalf Of
Garrett Hoxie
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 11:33 AM
To: Tucson Free Unix Group
Subject: Re: [Tfug] A very nice bandwidth test page...

12044 / 1069 on Cox Premium.  It's nice that they have a Scottsdale
server to test on.  I can't remember finding any on DSL reports or
anywhere else that were closer.

-Garrett

On 2/25/07, Jeremy D Rogers <jdrogers at northwestern.edu> wrote:
> Ya, I just got DSL last month from AT&T and once connected, they
> actually pointed me to that speedtest.net as well: 1302 kbps down, 308
> kbps up
> When I'm on campus at Northwestern: 5103kbps down, 4214kbps up
> What is interesting is that I wanted to see how UA compared since UA
> is internet2. So I SSHed in forwarding X and fired up firefox: 209kbps
> down, 4909kbps up. I could imaging this might in part be due to the
> traffic required for forwarding X, but why the disparity between up
> and down. If anything, I would have expected the up to be hurt the
> most since that's the direction of all the data for X forwarding. When
> I wget or apt-get, I usually see around 750kBps or 6mbps down.
>
> Bowie: What exactly are you 'tweaking'?
>
> > > > (7247kb per sec down / 732kb per sec up... so far. Still
tweaking my
> > > > gear for performance. Ha!)
>
>
> On 2/25/07, Benjamin Krein <superbenk at superk.org> wrote:
> > 15552 kbps down and 1806 kbps up ... YAY! for fiber-to-the-home
(Verizon
> > FiOS outside of Philly).
> >
> > Ben Krein
> > www.superk.org
> >
> > On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 01:37 -0700, Matt Jacob wrote:
> > > 6339 kbps down and 363 kbps up with Comcast. Who's your ISP,
Bowie?
> > >
> > > On 2/23/07, Bowie J. Poag <bpoag at comcast.net> wrote:
> > > > Nice flash interface, statistics, the whole nine yards. Very
slick.
> > > >
> > > > http://speedtest.net
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > (7247kb per sec down / 732kb per sec up... so far. Still
tweaking my
> > > > gear for performance. Ha!)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Tucson Free Unix Group - tfug at tfug.org
> > > > Subscription Options:
> > > > http://www.tfug.org/mailman/listinfo/tfug_tfug.org
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Tucson Free Unix Group - tfug at tfug.org
> > > Subscription Options:
> > > http://www.tfug.org/mailman/listinfo/tfug_tfug.org
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tucson Free Unix Group - tfug at tfug.org
> > Subscription Options:
> > http://www.tfug.org/mailman/listinfo/tfug_tfug.org
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tucson Free Unix Group - tfug at tfug.org
> Subscription Options:
> http://www.tfug.org/mailman/listinfo/tfug_tfug.org
>

_______________________________________________
Tucson Free Unix Group - tfug at tfug.org
Subscription Options:
http://www.tfug.org/mailman/listinfo/tfug_tfug.org

-- 
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.32/677 - Release Date:
2/8/2007 9:04 PM
 

-- 
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.32/677 - Release Date:
2/8/2007 9:04 PM